7 thoughts on “DeVere pays $8m to settle hidden Qrops commission case”

  • Martin Boon says:

    No surprise here – it is a shame what they got away with when I had the misfortune to be their Client when I was in UAE

  • James Caldwell says:

    Is it not time that the FCA took equally strong action against firms and specific individuals that purport to offer one thing “from the UK” but mislead “clients and prospective clients about the benefits of pension transfers while concealing material conflicts of interest” which create an incentive for the firms to recommend a pension transfer and particular product or service providers which are often connected by name and share ownership often offshore?

    How come the SEC can do what the FCA fails to do with British pensions?

  • Roger Berry says:

    Thanks To Bethell, those documents make interesting reading. The SEC document appears to state that a transfer of pension rights to a QROPS for a US citizen ( presumably their actual residence is not important) creates a distribution, thus taxes arise in the USA on the gains and income that have accrued in the plan? Thus potentially making such transfers hugely tax inefficient. If so, a matter of some consequence for all advisers and trustees involved in QROPS/SIPPs transfers for US citizens.

  • Bethell Codrington says:

    A lot of US citizens might be getting a nasty visit from IRS soon, wanting a big chunk of tax.
    The dangers of dealing with Product Sales people who have done a three day training course on how to sell a QROPS and Life Wrapper, but no idea of the implications or complexity required to give advice. They wouldn’t even know what something as simple as an FTC was, let alone anything else….

  • adkinson@private-capital.com.hk says:

    This will also be useful for the SFC in HK for their subsidiary firms, alas though as they are NOT regulated by the SFC, much too onerous so they choose a lesser regulator. It will still be passed on though.

Comments are closed.