x
Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Manager
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • NRI Adviser
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • CPD Corner
  • Media
    • Video
    • Square Mile Research
  • My IA
    • Events
    • Directory
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA
    • IA FAQ

SIGN IN International ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site and amend your account details



Not registered?

MetLife takes $210m hit over failed pension payments

By Robbie Lawther, 30 Jan 19

Insurer fined nearly $20m for not paying more than 13,000 people over 25 years

Illustration depicting an illuminated neon sign with a fines concept.

US-based insurance firm MetLife will hand over $19.75m (£15m, €17.3m) in penalties to New York’s Department of Financial Services (DFS) after it failed to pay pensions to over 13,000 people.

As part of a DFS order, MetLife will also pay benefits to policyholders in New York and elsewhere totalling more than $189m, of which $123m has already paid.

“[This] action is a victory for policyholders, whose benefits were not paid due to MetLife’s failures, with the department taking the necessary action to protect consumers,” Maria Vullo, financial services superintendent at DFS said.

“The restitution and other corrective actions mandated under this consent order will ensure that consumers are paid the benefits to which they are entitled and that an appropriate fine is paid and procedures put in place to prevent this from happening again.”

Violations

Within the order, MetLife was cited for violations dating from 1992 to 2017, including:

  • Failure to adequately search for group annuity certificate holders to whom it owed pension benefits and perform a cross-check against the Social Security Death Master File for group annuitants where a social security number was missing, or a number was invalid;
  • Failure to make “reasonable efforts” to confirm the death of an insured and timely commence outreach to beneficiaries where it did not have specific information in its administrative systems and to research and timely commence outreach where certain variations of an insured’s information existed in its administrative systems; and
  • Failure to ensure that variable annuity replacement disclosure statements were accurate and compliant with the law and to present consumers with an accurate comparison of the fees and expenses between existing and proposed variable annuity contracts.

Penalties

In addition to the benefits that have already been paid during the course of the DFS examination, MetLife is projected to make the following compensation to consumers:

  • $63m set aside for expected death claims based on a Social Security Death Master File process that the firm will use to identify life insurance and annuity contract holders who have died or where beneficiaries are unaware that they are entitled to benefits;
  • $1.85m in monthly payments to consumers as the company completes a group annuity remediation process; and
  • $1.5m in compensation to consumers whom the insurer failed to provide with accurate comparisons of fees and expenses when transferring from an existing to a new variable annuity contract.

Corrective measures

In addition to the fine and restitution, MetLife must take the following corrective measures:

  • Establish and maintain full statutory reserves for all group pension certificate holders;
  • Pay retroactive benefits with interest to already retired group certificate holders or their surviving beneficiaries; and
  • Send letters to all group annuity certificate holders no later than five years prior to the normal retirement date.

The order also requires MetLife to hire a third-party servicer that specialises in locating beneficiaries who are due pension benefits and have not been paid.

The firm will be responsible for paying all expenses incurred by the third-party servicer.

Tags: Metlife | New York Department Of Financial Services | Pensions | Regulation

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Aussie regulator to hand out harsher penalties and sanctions

    Latest news

    HMRC criticised over offshore tax avoidance pursuit

  • Companies

    Investors Trust expands into Puerto Rico

    Asia

    Why should investors look at value investing?


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe
  • SPONSORED BY Old Mutual International

    What the Isle of Man’s ‘code’ means for you

OTHER STORIES FROM LAST WORD...

Experts upbeat on green bond market

Are you investing in controversi...

Lazard offers Scandinavian bond ...

More news from EI

HEAD-TO-HEAD: Fidelity vs Haitong

The FSA Spy market buzz – 15 Feb...

Pictet Wealth defends hedge funds

More news from FSA

High Court rules against Woodfor...

Weekly outlook: Priips debated; ...

Janus Henderson property pricing...

More news from PA
  • View site map
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Acceptable Use Policy
  • Contact

International
Adviser

Published by Last Word Media (UK) Limited, Fleet House, 1st Floor, 59-61 Clerkenwell Road, London, EC1M 5LA. Copyright (c) 2019. All rights reserved. Company Reg. No. 05573633. VAT. No. 872 411 728. ISSN 2397-284X

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high net worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.

We use cookies to give you the best experience. If you do nothing we'll assume that it's okay. Find out more.