Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

Pru move to Asia resurfaces, faces ‘too big to fail’ rules

By Mark Battersby, 5 Oct 15

Prudential, one of the international insurance companies identified by the Financial Stability Board as ‘global systemically important’, is reported to be considering again a move away from its UK headquarters to Singapore or Hong Kong.

Prudential, one of the international insurance companies identified by the Financial Stability Board as ‘global systemically important’, is reported to be considering again a move away from its UK headquarters to Singapore or Hong Kong.

The Solvency II regulations, due to go live on 1 January 2016 after a number of delays, are causing the UK’s biggest insurer to contemplate selling its British operations or spin it out into a separate listed company, according to Sunday Times sources.

Earlier this year in its annual report, Prudential said its business in Asia faced a £1.9bn bill as a direct consequence of Solvency II.

The official line from the insurer continues to be that London remains a very attractive place to be domiciled but that as a large international group it regularly reviews the structure of the business.

On another front, The Financial Stability Board (FSB), established after the G-20 London summit in April 2009 as a successor to the Financial Stability Forum, met on 25 September in London to discuss its ‘too big to fail’ policies for banks and insurers.

The meeting endorsed the first version of what it terms the higher loss absorbency (HLA) requirement for global systemically important insurers developed by the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS).

The nine insurance groups identified by the FSB as systemically important, are: Aviva and Prudential (in the UK); AIG, MetLife and Prudential Financial (the US); Allianz (Germany), Axa (France); Assicurazioni Generali (Italy); and Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China (China).

But a number of these insurers disagreed with the proposed methodology for the HLA, stating in a joint letter on 21 August that it was “too blunt a tool built on still uncertain foundations”.

The finalised HLA proposal to the FSB is expected to get G20 endorsement in November this year.

Tags: Prudential

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    Finance firms could face FOS complaints for unsuitable targeted support

    Industry

    FCA confirms introduction of targeted support from spring 2026

  • Industry

    FCA proposes raft of pension transfer reforms to help savers make informed decisions

    Industry

    FCA to consult on ditching insurance rules for non-UK business


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.