Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

Investment firm charged over selling high-risk bonds to retirees

By Robbie Lawther, 20 Jun 22

Products were ‘only suitable for customers with substantial financial resources’

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has charged registered broker-dealer Western International Securities and five of its brokers – Nancy Cole, Patrick Egan, Andy Gitipityapon, Steven Graham, and Thomas Swan – with violating best interest obligation regulations.

The best interest obligation rules are a standard of conduct for broker-dealers and advisers when they make a recommendation to a retail customer of any investment strategy involving securities.

The US regulator said the brokers “recommended and sold an unrated, high-risk debt security known as L Bonds to retirees and other retail investors”.

From July 2020 through April 2021, Western sold a total of $13.3m (£10.9m, €12.7m) of L Bonds.

The SEC alleges that, during the period, Western and the brokers recommended and sold L Bonds to retail customers, many of whom were on fixed incomes and had moderate risk tolerances, despite issuer GWG Holdings stating the L Bonds were high risk, illiquid, and “only suitable for customers with substantial financial resources”.

The defendants allegedly “failed to comply” with rules around care obligation “because they did not exercise reasonable diligence, care, and skill to understand the risks, rewards, and costs associated with L Bonds, and also because they recommended L Bonds to at least seven particular customers without a reasonable basis to believe the bonds were in their customers’ best interests”.

The SEC added that Western failed to comply with the rules “because it did not adequately establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance”.

Gurbir Grewal, director of the SEC’s division of enforcement, said: “Broker-dealers must act in the best interest of their customers. When they fail to do so, as we allege happened here, they put retail investors at risk, and we’ll hold them accountable.”

Tags: SEC | US

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Macquarie Securities to pay AU$35m fine for ‘systemic failures’

    fund

    Industry

    AJ Bell expands Gilt MPS range with new portfolio launch

  • Best Practice

    CII Middle East director: Education and qualifications a priority for boosting talent in 2026

    Ben Lester

    Industry

    Morningstar Wealth: Smaller advice firms are feeling the pressure of a demanding new year


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.