Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • My IA
    • Events
    • Directory
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

UK financial watchdog sets out key focus for year ahead

By Robbie Lawther, 17 Apr 19

DB pension transfers and retirement outcomes review on the agenda for 2019

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has said there is an “inherent conflict of interest” when firms use contingent charging structures for DB pension transfers, according to its business plan for 2019/2020, where it assessed its activity for the next financial year.

Alongside DB issues, the UK regulator also said it is continuing to consult the industry on further requirements for firms to provide a range of investment pathways to help consumers choose options that meet their needs when entering drawdown.

Defined benefit transfers

The FCA plans to start a “wide ranging programme of activity”, where it may take action against any firm that continues to harm consumers while involved in DB pension transfers.

It added: “There is an inherent conflict of interest when firms use contingent charging structures. We asked for views on how these structures for pension transfer advice may cause consumer harm.

“To help with our policy development, the Work and Pensions Committee also held an inquiry into charging for pension transfer advice.

“Using all this information, our policy team are now analysing if and what action we may need to take.

“If we consider that rule changes are appropriate, we will consult on any new proposals in the summer of 2019.”

Tom McPhail, head of policy at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: “Much of the FCA’s regulatory agenda on pensions looks like business as usual, with no surprises or new policy announcements; everything set out in their business plan for the retirement market has already been flagged up elsewhere.”

Industry concerns over drawdown ‘rememdies’

The FCA also said that the review into retirement outcomes highlighted that consumers entering drawdown often struggle to make investment decisions or do not engage with the topic enough to do so.

The UK financial watchdog is to publish a second policy statement setting out the rest of the retirement outcome reviews after its consultation, which finished earlier this month.

The Personal Investment Management and Financial Advice Association (Pimfa) said in response to the consultation: “We have a general concern that these remedies will, in effect, unintentionally dis-incentivise individuals to engage with their pensions.

“You will recall that, prior to the introduction of pension freedoms, a large proportion of consumers bought retirement income direct from their existing providers without seeking better deals on the open market.

“Our concern with the roll out of investment pathways is that many of the consumer behaviours which you have previously sought to eradicate from the retirement market will be repeated with the roll out of investment pathways.”

Hargreaves’ McPhail echoed this sentiment and added: “We worry the proposed remedies may not achieve the outcomes the FCA intends.

“They may perpetuate customer disengagement and paper over the income withdrawal risks, leaving investors potentially exposed to as much or even more risk than if the pathways hadn’t been introduced.”

Tags: DB pensions | FCA

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • EU confirms insurance regulations delay

    Europe

    ESMA consultation closes on technical standards around ESG ratings activities

    Equities

    Evelyn Partners notes ‘sizeable’ shift in active MPS rebalancing

  • Latest news

    Latest UK tax receipt data draws range of industry comment

    Industry

    Capital International acquires Affinity investment business


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.