Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

UK businessman loses bid to avoid IHT

By Cristian Angeloni, 2 Apr 20

Brexit campaigner Arron Banks claimed EU rules meant his political donation was tax exempt

A well-known UK businessman has seen his case to dodge paying inheritance tax (IHT) quashed in the upper tribunal. 

Arron Banks donated around £1m ($1.2m, €1.1m) to the UK Independence Party (Ukip) between October 2014 and March 2015. 

Under section 24 of the Inheritance Tax Act (IHTA), donations to political parties are exempt from tax; provided they have either two members of parliament (MPs) elected; or one elected MP and received at least 150,000 votes. 

Despite Ukip receiving a total of 919,471 votes in the 2010 general election, the party did not have any MPs elected to the House of Commons at the time of the donations.

This meant that Banks’ contribution was subject to IHT, and HM Revenue & Customs said his bill is just under £163,000.  

Physical parliamentary representation 

But the businessman turned to European law to prove his donation was not supposed to be subject to taxation, and that applying IHT rules was a breach of his human rights.  

The upper tribunal ruled: “The differential treatment of which Banks complains, namely the taxation of his contributions to Ukip, was not discrimination that fell within the scope of article 14 [of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)]. 

“The aim of s 24 IHTA is to provide tax relief on donations to political parties that are participating in parliamentary democracy by being represented in the House of Commons, and not in respect of individual, independent MPs. 

“There has been no breach of article 14 ECHR […] and no breach of Banks’ rights,” the judge concluded. 

Tags: IHT | Tribunal

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Ben Lester

    Industry

    Morningstar Wealth: Smaller advice firms are feeling the pressure of a demanding new year

    Will inflation remain absent?

    Latest news

    Bank of England cuts base rate to 3.75%

  • Companies

    Skybound Wealth adds global tax planning capability to Athletes and Creators offering

    Industry

    UK government refuses to commit to ‘pensions tax lock’


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.