Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

South Africa regulator bans investment firm directors

By Cristian Angeloni, 15 Jun 20

After the watchdog withdrew the company’s licence over breach of suitability requirements

The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has debarred two key individuals linked to investment firm Ecsponent Financial Services. 

Floris Slabbert and Anton Hay have been banned for two years, as they have “contributed significantly to the breaches” of financial services laws. 

The South African regulator withdrew the firm’s licence on 4 June 2020. 

The FSCA said it found the company did not carry out suitability testing before selling products to clients. 

Ecsponent used a network of representatives to market the shares of its parent company, Ecsponent Limited, to raise capital. 

Unlawful agreements 

The firm’s staff gave financial advice on the redeemable preference shares, intended to mimic a monthly pension income payment to its clients, most of which were pensioners.

But the FSCA said that, contrary to pension payments, Ecsponent advisers exposed investors to a much higher risk. 

The watchdog added: “The FSCA’s investigation entailed extensive interaction with Ecsponent FS, mainly because the financial services provider was of the view that it was not required to conduct suitability testing and relied on a specific financial service agreement wherein the investor instructs the adviser or intermediary not to perform a comprehensive financial needs analysis, but to render a specific financial service.  

“Ecsponent FS argued that by signing the agreement, the investor understood that a full analysis would not be undertaken by the adviser.  

“The FSCA held that such an agreement was unlawful, and that Ecsponent FS could not rely on it. The Authority also found that Ecsponent FS was in breach of suitability standards.” 

Tags: Ban | FSCA | South Africa | Suitability

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Macquarie Securities to pay AU$35m fine for ‘systemic failures’

    fund

    Industry

    AJ Bell expands Gilt MPS range with new portfolio launch

  • Best Practice

    CII Middle East director: Education and qualifications a priority for boosting talent in 2026

    Ben Lester

    Industry

    Morningstar Wealth: Smaller advice firms are feeling the pressure of a demanding new year


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.