Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

Solvency II impact becoming clearer

27 Jun 11

The Solvency II directive is likely to have a greater impact on cross-border life firms than thought

The Solvency II directive is likely to have a greater impact on cross-border life firms than thought

Acuity says with the Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors Level 2 advice on the calibrations for calculating Solvency II capital having been published last month the requirements on firms is becoming much clearer.

The firm estimates that for a cross-border life company writing 95%+ linked-life business, the solvency capital required by the current ‘one dimensional’ Solvency I measurement might be reduced by as much as one third. However, Acuity says the new risk-based elements of Solvency II are likely to see increases in solvency capital requirements due to some specific aspects of cross-border life business.

Acuity says of relevance to cross-border life companies will be requirements to assess:

  • Lapse risk – perhaps the risk with potentially the biggest impact on solvency capital, especially for those companies writing regular premium business with poor levels of persistency
  • Counterparty default risk – this would almost certainly include indemnity commission debts
  • Life company expense risk – ‘soft’ payments to distributors and ‘marketing costs’ might form part of this but might also include the impact of changing expense rates, mismatching income and expenses
  • Asset concentration risk – a relevant issue where the cross-border life company ends up holding a large portion of a boutique fund via a series of portfolio bond investments

The firm added that while there is a possibility for most cross-border life companies the Solvency II bill could mean their capital requirements are lower than they are currently, for those writing traditional international regular premium business it is clear “a number of the sectors’ historic demons may be about to be a little harder to ignore”.

Tags: Acuity | Solvency II

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Macquarie Securities to pay AU$35m fine for ‘systemic failures’

    fund

    Industry

    AJ Bell expands Gilt MPS range with new portfolio launch

  • Best Practice

    CII Middle East director: Education and qualifications a priority for boosting talent in 2026

    Ben Lester

    Industry

    Morningstar Wealth: Smaller advice firms are feeling the pressure of a demanding new year


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.