Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

Naming and shaming tax avoiders doesn’t work

By Kirsten Hastings, 24 Jul 18

The threat of having their names made public does not stop people and companies from avoiding paying tax, a report commissioned by HM Revenue & Customs has found.

Convoy warns of dodgy shares

The publishing details of deliberate defaulters (PDDD) policy came into force in 2010, with the first tranche of names released in 2013.

Included are people who have been penalised for deliberate inaccuracies, failures or wrongdoing amounting to more than £25,000 ($32,814, €28,015).

“We believe that the possibility of having their details published will deter people from becoming deliberate defaulters,” HMRC said at the time.

“We also believe that it will encourage deliberate defaulters to come forward and put their tax affairs in order.”

No evidence

However, a report by consultancy Quadrangle on behalf of HMRC, has found “no strong evidence that PDDD is an effective deterrent to defaulting on one’s tax obligations” for businesses or individuals that submit their own tax returns.

It found that “some defaulters were not actually aware that their details had been published”.

Of those that were aware of publication, some were angry or “felt residual shame” but “nobody felt publication had affected them specifically in any significant or material way”.

Public awareness and impact

Being publicly named and shamed was the least well-known consequence of HMRC’s tax evasion tackling powers, with just 28% of people surveyed being aware of it.

This compares with 70% of people being aware of fines and penalties.

Just 43% of the general public claimed they may avoid using businesses that have had their details published by HMRC.

“Due to a very limited awareness of publication, PDDD was not seen as an effective deterrent against defaulting on tax obligations,” the report stated.

Source: HMRC/Quadrangle

Tags: HMRC | Tax Avoidance

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Hamid

    Industry

    Former Invesco head launches EM investment platform

    Industry

    Finance firms could face FOS complaints for unsuitable targeted support

  • Industry

    FCA confirms introduction of targeted support from spring 2026

    Industry

    FCA proposes raft of pension transfer reforms to help savers make informed decisions


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.