Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • M&A Deals
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Square Mile Research
  • My IA
    • Events
    • Directory
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

FSCS cap saw investors lose £1bn in compensation

By Cristian Angeloni, 26 May 22

Pension advice claims made up almost half of the total

Savers have been undercompensated by as much as £1bn ($1.2bn, €1.1bn) over the last six years because of the limit on how much the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) can pay.

Almost half (£472m) of the total that investors missed out on related to pension advice claims.

As a result, the lifeboat scheme is calling for the current £85,000 threshold to be increased to further protect consumers from harm.

The lifeboat scheme lamented that the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) has been granted the ability to award up to £375,000 from 1 April 2022, and that its limits are automatically adjusted each year in line with inflation.

The same cannot be said for the FSCS’ threshold which has remained the same, but the UK lifeboat scheme believes “there is a strong case” for a similar mechanism to be introduced.

The FSCS said: “For pensions advice claims, including pension transfers, the rise in uncompensated loss has been far steeper, and the average uncompensated loss per customer far greater than the average across all claim types.

“The total number of claims where the customer’s loss was over the relevant limit was almost 3,600 in the 2021/22 financial year that has just ended. This number has risen steadily over the past six years, and in that period has resulted in just short of £1bn in loss not being paid back to customers as compensation.”

Simon Wilson, head of resolution at the FSCS, added: “When we declare an IFA in default, we see claims where customers have lost hundreds of thousands of pounds, life changing sums of money that we simply can’t return due to the limits in place.”

‘Delicate balancing act’

Tom Selby, head of retirement policy at AJ Bell, said: “The FSCS provides hugely valuable protection for savers and investors in the event the firm they have trusted with their cash goes to the wall.

“This compensation scheme is not only vital in helping those who face financial disaster – it also gives people confidence their hard-earned savings will be safe even if the worst were to happen.

“That over £1bn of losses have gone uncompensated due to the £85,000 cap in the past six years sounds shocking on the face of it, with roughly half of those uncompensated losses linked to pensions advice. Given the scale of uncompensated losses, the FSCS understandably wants to see the pensions compensation cap increased above £85,000.

“However, the FSCS faces a delicate balancing act as the funds used to pay compensation come directly from financial services firms via an annual levy. In 2022/23 that levy is expected to be £625m, and any increase in the pensions compensation cap would inevitably increase the pressure on the overall levy.

“If the compensation limit for pensions were to be increased, this should be as part of a broader review of how the FSCS is funded.

“As things stand, good firms doing the right thing by their customers are forced to fork out for huge FSCS levy bills in order to compensate the wrongdoing of a few bad apples. Where firms are found guilty of wrongdoing and are fined by the FCA, this money goes straight to the Treasury.

“There is a strong argument for using money from FCA fines to pay compensation to customers. This would be a genuine ‘polluter pays’ model that could be used to both boost compensation to customers and lower FSCS costs to the rest of the industry.”

Tags: AJ Bell | Compensation | FSCS

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Europe

    Relationship reset confirmed between London and Brussels at 1st UK-EU Summit

    Latest news

    IA: In The Loop Podcast EP 3 – Titan Wealth International

  • Latest news

    IFGL adds three new NEDs starting 1 June

    United Kingdom

    II Connect 2025 – grab a last chance ticket to next Tuesday’s big event in London


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.