Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

FCA addresses market concerns over compensation hike

By Kirsten Hastings, 6 Jun 19

UK firms struggling to get PI insurance after limit raised to £350,000

The UK financial watchdog has written to businesses in a bid to allay questions and concerns that followed in the wake of the decision to sharply increase the upper compensation limit payable to customers.

From 1 April, the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) can demand firms compensate consumers and businesses to the tune of £350,000 ($444,653, €395,093), up from £150,000.

Naturally, a few eyebrows were raised.

The move has made it even more difficult for firms to secure the necessary professional indemnity (PI) insurance they need.

In a letter dated 17 May, seen by International Adviser, Nisha Arora, director, consumer and retail policy, provided more information to firms.

Since publishing the FCA’s policy statement explaining its decision to increase the FOS award limit, Arora said, “my team has engaged with a number of stakeholders, including PI insurance providers and brokers”.

The letter outlines details those stakeholders requested.

“We think this information will help address some of the issues or questions stakeholders have raised regarding the ombudsman service’s approach to complaints, and improve PI insurers’ understanding of the potential distribution of high value compensation awards,” Arora added.

Copies of the letter were also sent to a number of professional bodies; including the British Insurance Brokers Association, Broker Network, the Personal Investment Management and Financial Advice Association and the Personal Finance Society, among others.

Additional governance arrangements

One of the questions raised by stakeholders was governance arrangements for high value complaints.

In response, the ombudsman service has now updated its online technical resource on compensation with a note on award limit governance.

“The additional arrangements build on existing robust quality assurance principles and controls by ensuring that all cases where the potential award for compensation is more than £150,000 are reported to the ombudsman’s legal team and its senior manager,” the FCA said.

“This is to help ensure that all relevant sources of information and relevant points of law have been considered, and that complaints have been considered in a consistent way.”

Granular information

Following requests from insurers and brokers, the FCA is making data tables available that provide a breakdown of the aggregate annual total additional redress figures.

The estimates are drawn from three years of data provided by the ombudsman service on the total number of complaints received, average uphold rate, and the compensation awards made by ombudsmen and case handlers.

Knowing your limits

The final point revolves around businesses determining which limit applied to each case.

Under the new rules, the maximum award for a case prior to 1 April 2019 is £160,000 – while those eligible for up to £350,000 had to take place after that date.

In most cases, the ombudsman will decide the limit based on what happened in the case and the proper application of the rules to those circumstances.

However, if there is a question, or the firm thinks there should be, the firm in question will have an opportunity to make representations about the application of the time limits in those circumstances.

Tags: Compensation | FCA | Ombudsman

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Asia

    Macquarie Securities to pay AU$35m fine for ‘systemic failures’

    fund

    Industry

    AJ Bell expands Gilt MPS range with new portfolio launch

  • Best Practice

    CII Middle East director: Education and qualifications a priority for boosting talent in 2026

    Ben Lester

    Industry

    Morningstar Wealth: Smaller advice firms are feeling the pressure of a demanding new year


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.