Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

‘Expensive’ trackers overlooked in active/passive debate

7 Apr 17

Passive funds charging investors over the odds have fallen under the radar as the debate over active fees has raged, according to Morningstar’s Jonathan Miller.

Passive funds charging investors over the odds have fallen under the radar as the debate over active fees has raged, according to Morningstar’s Jonathan Miller.

There is a danger that all passive funds are considered cheap and good value by definition he said, as criticisms of active managers charging ‘exorbitant’ fees have become the focal point of discussion.

But Miller, head of manager research, said investors should be wary of unjustifiably expensive index trackers charging over the odds.

He lists the Halifax UK FTSE 100 tracker fund and the Virgin UK Index Tracking Trust, with combined assets of £3.7bn, as clear examples of the practice.

Each lists an ongoing charge of 1% fee to track the FTSE 100 and FTSE All Share respectively.

Alternative funds in the market, such as BlackRock’s UK equity trackers and Fidelity’s Index UK, charge a significantly lower 0.06% for what is essentially the same product.

The iShares S&P 500 ETF, one of the largest in Europe with £8bn worth of assets, charges 0.4%, while the same firm offers a similar product, the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF which charges just 0.07%.

The Source S&P 500 charges less again, just 0.05%.

In emerging market trackers iShares also has different charges for two similar products.

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF, with £3.9bn of assets, charges 0.75%, three times as much as the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets tracker which has fees of 0.25%.

continued on the next page

Pages: Page 1, Page 2

Tags: Investment Strategy | Morningstar | Passive Investing

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    UK finance firms join forces to launch retail investment campaign

    Companies

    VIDEO: II’s The Breakfast Briefing EP 2 – Sam Instone, CEO, AES International

  • Heather Hopkins

    Industry

    MPS assets surge 32% to £190bn as adviser usage grows

    Hamid

    Industry

    Former Invesco head launches EM investment platform


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.