Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • My IA
    • Events
    • Directory
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

SIGN IN INTERNATIONAL ADVISER

Access full content on the International Adviser site, access your saved articles, control email preferences and amend your account details

[login-with-ajax]
Not Registered?

Complexity of Asia hinders fund passport schemes

By International Adviser, 25 May 16

Varying tax and regulatory issues across the region could disrupt the Asia Region Funds Passport initiative, according to Mostapha Tahiri, chief executive and head of asset and fund services for Asia at BNP Paribas Securities Services.

After six years of negotation, in April Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand signed a memorandum of cooperation on the ARFP, which will come into effect on 30 June.

The participating countries will then have up to 18 months to implement any necessary domestic arrangements. Activation of the fund passport will start as soon as any two participating countries meet all requirements.

Tahiri said the differing investment cultures and divergent tax schemes could be major constraints.

“This could be a challenge for fund managers with international brand names to bring their existing products into the region,” he told International Adviser’s sister publication Fund Selector Asia.

Home bias

For example, among the four countries, Australia’s fund industry operates in a very specific market with products focused on domestic investors who tend to have an appetite for investing in onshore instruments. The strong home bias could discourage investment in the unfamiliar products coming in through the passport.

Likewise, interest among Australian asset management firms to launch products in offshore markets would be limited. “[Australia] is a huge, self sufficient market in a way,” Tahiri said.

His view on Australia has been shared by some analysts. Cerulli said significant differences in the country’s tax laws and investment culture compared to many of the other participant countries are seen as obstacles to the fund passport scheme.

Mature and developing markets

Japan and South Korea are also mature markets, but they are not very open to international investors, while New Zealand is similar to Australia, Tahiri added.

Thailand and the Phillipines, two developing markets, signed a statement of understanding in September 2015 and are expected to join at some point.

The notable absence of Singapore was due to the failure of the multi-country agreement to address the different tax treatment between onshore and offshore funds.

“Singapore wants to make sure the rules are the same, but they are not completely rejecting the passport scheme.” Tahiri said.

He expects the ARFP to begin in 2018 or 2019.

HK’s MRF `easiest’

Two other cross-border mutual fund initiatives have been launched in Asia.

The Asean Collective Investment Scheme (Cis) framework, between Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand launched in August 2014 and the Mutual Recognition of Funds between Hong Kong and China, launched in July 2015.

According to industry reports, five funds have been successfully approved and launched in a host jurisdiction via the Asean Cis as of late March. The MRF, however, which was launched later, has 20 funds available for sale currently.

Tahiri said the MRF is the easiest to implement compared to the other two schemes.

“Getting the two [China and Hong Kong] to agree is easier than getting three to four [countries] to agree,” he said. “There is a lot of interest in the China market. The only way for international funds to get distribution into China is by using the Hong Kong platform.”

Tags: Australia | Japan | New Zealand | South Korea

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Latest news

    UK’s Reform party plans for non doms tax breaks slammed

    EU confirms insurance regulations delay

    Europe

    ESMA consultation closes on technical standards around ESG ratings activities

  • Asia

    HSBC appoints head for wealth in Singapore

    Best Practice

    TISA welcomes spotlight on poor access to financial advice


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.