Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

South African regulator fines financial advice firm ZAR100m

By Cristian Angeloni, 2 Oct 19

After it blames ‘black swan’ event for one of its funds dropping 66% in less than a week

South Africa’s Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has imposed a ZAR100m (£5.3m, $6.5m, €5.9m) penalty on MET Collective Investments (METCI) for breaching the country’s financial laws.

The investment management firm, which provides portfolio management and financial advisory services to individual and institutional clients, was found to have improper risk management, control, oversight and governance over one of its unit trust funds.

As a result, the Third Circle MET Target Return Fund lost around 66% of its value between 8 and 11 December 2015.

The company blamed “unforeseeable market movements” following the sacking of finance minister Nhlanhla Nene by former president Jacob Zuma on 9 December 2015, which it described as a black swan event.

But the FSCA dismissed this argument.

Breaching laws

In addition, the watchdog discovered “that the extent of the fund’s exposure to derivatives was contrary to the prescripts of the relevant financial sector laws as well as the fund’s own investment policy statement and mandate”.

This led to the firm breaching exposure limits as the fund was predominantly exposed to derivatives and did not have the cover required under South African financial regulations.

Some of METCI’s statements regarding the fund were also found to be misleading.

“It stated that the fund was predominantly invested in cash and the money market, whereas the fund over a period was almost wholly invested in derivatives,” the FSCA said.

“This, the [FSCA] found, was misleading as the [minimum disclosure documents (MDDs)] did not disclose the nature of the fund as well as risks associated with the fund.”

Tags: Fine | FSCA | South Africa

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Ben Lester

    Industry

    Morningstar Wealth: Smaller advice firms are feeling the pressure of a demanding new year

    Will inflation remain absent?

    Latest news

    Bank of England cuts base rate to 3.75%

  • Companies

    Skybound Wealth adds global tax planning capability to Athletes and Creators offering

    Industry

    UK government refuses to commit to ‘pensions tax lock’


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.