Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

UK MPs query regulator over £74m financial adviser levy

27 Apr 16

The chairman of the UK’s Treasury select committee, Andrew Tyrie, has asked the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to explain how it will ensure levy payers are getting value for money.

The chairman of the UK’s Treasury select committee, Andrew Tyrie, has asked the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to explain how it will ensure levy payers are getting value for money.

He told FCA chairman John Griffith-Jones to write a letter setting out how the FCA justifies the regulatory fees paid by financial services firms.

Earlier this month, the FCA set out its £518.9m ($750m, €666.7m) budget for 2016/17, with financial advisers paying £73.7m towards it.

The levy represents a 1.6% reduction in fees compared to the £74.9m paid out the previous year.

Furthermore, advisers will also receive a £4.2m rebate on its 2016/17 fees from fines levied against firms over the past year.

Speaking at a committee hearing on Tuesday, Tyrie said that firms paying the levy were not happy they were getting value for money from their regulatory fees.

‘I’m not going to raise this with you in any great detail now, but there’s dissatisfaction, concern, that we might not be getting value for money from the levy,’ he said.

‘The levy is always paid for by consumers in the end. It’s a cost we are all bearing and we need to make sure we do get good value for money for it.’

Tags: FCA | Levy

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Industry

    UK government refuses to commit to ‘pensions tax lock’

    How to save the pan European pension dream

    Latest news

    IFGL Pensions connects to Pensions Dashboard

  • FCA building and logo

    Industry

    FCA launches consultations on UK crypto rules

    Industry

    ASIC suspends MW Planning’s licence over failure to replace banned manager linked to Shield


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.