Skip to content
International Adviser
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Regions
    • United Kingdom
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Asia
    • Africa
    • North America
    • Latin America
  • Industry
    • Tax & Regulation
    • Products
    • Life
    • Health & Protection
    • People Moves
    • Companies
    • Offshore Bonds
    • Retirement
    • Technology
    • Platforms
  • Investment
    • Equities
    • Fixed Income
    • Alternatives
    • Multi Asset
    • Property
    • Macro Views
    • Structured Products
    • Emerging Markets
    • Commodities
  • IA 100
  • Best Practice
    • Best Practice News
    • Best Practice Awards
  • Media
    • Video
    • Podcast
  • Directory
  • My IA
    • Events
    • IA Tax Panel
    • IA Intermediary Panel
    • About IA

ANNOUNCEMENT: Read more financial articles on our partner site, click here to read more.

Adviser cleared defrauding his mother out of £137,000

By Robbie Lawther, 21 Dec 18

Jury finds the managing director of Cascade Wealth Management not guilty

The managing director of Cardiff-based Cascade Wealth Management has been cleared of defrauding his elderly mother out of £137,000.

Financial adviser, Simon Haydock, was found not guilty of fraud by a jury at Newport Crown Court, after this publication had reported on the accusation recently.

The court was told he had spent cash given to him on “high-risk investments and gambling”.

Following their deliberations, the jury cleared the managing director of Cascade Wealth Management of any wrongdoing, the BBC reports.

Details

Haydock had insisted his mother Geraldine Haydock had told to him to “have the money and enjoy it” with his family.

His mother, who is in her 70s, had sold her home in Neath in 2010 and gave the money to her son to invest on her behalf, jurors were told.

The court heard Geraldine Haydock believed her son had “reinvested it against my wishes”.

Haydock spent the money on “high-risk spread betting investments, some went into his wife’s shares, and some was gambled online”, the trial heard.

Within a month, much of the cash was gone.

The court heard Haydock’s mother had asked for the money to be returned, but he insisted it had been a gift – and he was unable give the cash back as it was spent.

Judge Daniel Williams said the case rested on what he called a “stark conflict in evidence – the issue of whether the proceeds of the sale were given so that he would invest them or whether they were given as a gift”.

Tags: Fraud

Share this article
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
X (Twitter)
Post on X
LinkedIn
Share

Related Stories

  • Ben Lester

    Industry

    Morningstar Wealth: Smaller advice firms are feeling the pressure of a demanding new year

    Will inflation remain absent?

    Latest news

    Bank of England cuts base rate to 3.75%

  • Companies

    Skybound Wealth adds global tax planning capability to Athletes and Creators offering

    Industry

    UK government refuses to commit to ‘pensions tax lock’


NEWSLETTER

Sign Up for International
Adviser Daily Newsletter

subscribe

  • View site map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Published by Money Map Media – part of G&M Media Ltd Copyright (c) 2024.

International Adviser covers the global intermediary market that uses cross-border insurance, investments, banking and pension products on behalf of their high-net-worth clients. No news, articles or content may be reproduced in part or in full without express permission of International Adviser.